• About
  • Careers
  • Charity and Not-For-Profit
  • Client Portal
  • Commercial
  • Contact Us
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Home
  • News & Insights
  • Our Team
  • Pay Your Bill
  • Portfolio
  • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • OUR PRACTICE GROUPS
    • Commercial
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Charity and Not-For-Profit
  • Our Team
  • News & Insights
  • Contact Us
    • Careers
  • (03) 9629 9629 (Main Line)
News

Challenging appointments in the matter of Walton Construction Pty Ltd (in liq)

By admin  Published On 18/02/2014

Challenging appointments in the matter of Walton Construction Pty Ltd (in liq)

The Federal Court handed down judgment last Thursday in Australian Securities and Investment Commission v Franklin (liquidator), in the matter of Walton Construction Pty Ltd (in liq) [2014] FCA 68 (13 February 2014).

ASIC sought Orders removing the Liquidators of the subject companies on the basis of an apprehension of a lack of independence and impartiality, and (or in the alternative) a declaration that the Liquidators had contravened their obligations in relation to their DIRRI (Declaration of Relevant Relationships).

They key issues related to the belief that the referring business advisors had worked with the companies prior to liquidation (including in relation to transactions which may require investigation such that the transactions, the directors and the business advisors may need to be challenged by the liquidators) and the business advisors had referred several other voluntary administrations to the liquidators’ firm previously, which generated a significant volume of fee paying work. ASIC argued that due to the ongoing commercial relationship, generating significant fees, there may be a reasonable perception that the Liquidators may (consciously or not) wish “not to bite the hand that feeds them”.

The Court found that no logical connection was made out for any apparent conflict, and they were “not persuaded that there is any substance in the claim of apprehended lack of independence”. Further, the Court refused the request regarding the DIRRI, finding that the DIRRI was adequate under the statutory requirements. ASIC are currently reviewing the judgment, so we will watch this space.

The original judgment can be accessed here.

If you wish to discuss the judgment, the appointment of an external administrator, or your obligations under DIRRIs, please contact Amanda Carruthers or Paul Holdway.

Breaking news: on 26 February 2014, ASIC filed an appeal with the Federal Court of Australia. No date has been set for the hearing of the appeal, so watch this space.


Declaration of Relevant RelationshipsDIRRIFranklinWalton Construction

Related Articles


Business  ·  News
Eyes on independence and referrals: in the matter of Walton Constructions
Legal Services Packages
Previous Article
Do you need to change your approach to Privacy?
Next Article

QUICK LINKS

HOME ABOUT OUR PRACTICE GROUPS OUR TEAM NEWS & INSIGHTS CONTACT US CLIENT PORTAL PRIVACY POLICY
  • +613 9629 9629 (Main Line)
  • office@lewisholdway.com.au
  • Level 10, 91 William St. Melbourne VIC 3000
  • P.O. Box 138, Collins Street West VIC 8007

OUR PARTNERS

Copyright © 2021 Lewis Holdway Lawyers.